[Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479





--- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-01-29 21:20:25 EDT ---
I'm still trying to have a better name for subpackage.

I'm quite not sure if we should treat a proportional designed gothic typeface
as different font family name to gothic typeface. if we do, which name could we
recognize as a family name? is "pgothic" a common sense for that as it's named?
or should we have "proportional-gothic" as a family name?

I impressed "proportional-gothic" is too long. if you have any suggestion, it
would be appreciated.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.