[Bug 507261] Package building strategy is inconsistent between sazanami fonts and IPA fonts

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507261





--- Comment #4 from Takanori MATSUURA <t.matsuu at gmail.com>  2009-06-22 02:07:09 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)

Hmm, I can now see both "4 fonts package" and separate zip archive are
available from the official site.  I have never found separate zip archives in
early time when IPA font 00301 has been released.

In this case, do we have to separate ghostscript files if we will fix bug
507262 with my suggestion?
It's too inconvenience.


Number 1 of "Package layout for fonts" in the URL mentioned in comment #3
should be updated like the following:

Fonts released upstream in separate archives MUST be packaged in separate
source packages (src.rpm), unless they belong to the same font family. If fonts
released upstream are also released as a merged archive, this rule will not
applied.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.