[Bug 497646] Upgrade path is broken

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 22 12:43:43 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




--- Comment #28 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-06-22 08:43:42 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> Nicolas: was there a package in common use or in fedora that was renamed when
> it came into fedora? If so, then it needs to have an obsolete

This entry has derived massively from the original subject.

The original report was: Fedora upgrade path is broken because a Fedora package
has been split, and a third-party package depended on it
=> NOTOURBUG, we've fixed our packages, and have no control of what
third-parties do. If our upgrade path was broken for a package as massively
deployed as liberation bugzilla would overflow with problem reports.
Third-party packages should not expect Fedora font package names to live
forever, and a release change is the right moment to break compat on this front

Then someone noticed the spec declared some explicit conflicts. As far as I
know they were added to help yum during groupinstalls (in the course of
resolving bug #474514). If you confirm they are not actually needed we'll
remove them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list