[Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Nov 4 09:13:01 UTC 2009

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-11-04 04:13:00 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> 1. I used one of your spec files as a template, oops =). I have correct that
> and am now using the template from fontpackages-devel.

We used to package fonts that way but it was changed for Fedora 11 to
accomodate the font autoinstaller and simplify things.

> 2. Those were choices made by the creator and I didn't feel comfortable
> changing them. I have corrected all of them.


> 3. The font name is not in either the Summary or the %description, only here in
> the Review Request. No action needed.

It was in the spec file I checked. Maybe you published the wrong version?

> 7. I ran repo-font-audit, rpmlint and fontlint correcting all but the warning
> about the license.
> Will the license issue need to be corrected before this can pass review?  

No, this is not a blocker, just something it is a very good idea to fix
upstream, as it confuses users when the licensing they see in font browsers is
not the same the package declares (also I suppose that when Fedora does
licensing audits it makes things a lot harder than it should be)

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list