[Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 6 21:04:03 UTC 2009

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(john.brown009 at gma
                   |                            |il.com)

--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-11-06 16:04:02 EDT ---
The spec file is now clean
The font is also clean

However it seems I had forgotten to check your fontconfig file (bad bad tired
reviewer) and it is not clean:

A. please make sure it conforms to the latest basic template in

B. please make sure you use the actual font name in it (can check it with
fc-cache). Fontconfig can only act on the name the font files declares, so for
your rules to work you need an exact match

C. Please make sure you use the correct generic family for this kind of font
(see fontconfig-generics.txt in fontpackages-devel)

D. It's probably not a good idea to put the font at 60, since it lacks bold,
italic, etc variants. Let fonts with more variants claim the first places, and
increase your prefix value (see fontconfig-priorities.txt in

Anyway that's nice progress on your part, just the last mile to go now

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list