[Bug 530880] Review Request: ns-tiza-fonts - A Slab-Serif Font

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Nov 7 02:33:24 UTC 2009

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


--- Comment #10 from TK009 <john.brown009 at gmail.com>  2009-11-06 21:33:23 EDT ---
I should have been clearer in my comment. This is the second time you've seen
something in the review that I didn't upload. The first was the font name in
the description. I thought it was somehow an error on my part. I checked for
the name in the file but made no change as it wasn't there.

Now the font prefix is not correct (I am not sure 61 is correct either, it was
a guess after talking to another fonts packager about the setting).

Both my spec file and srpm spec have 61 as the prefix, I am concerned we are
not seeing the same file and I am trying to determine the cause.

If Serif is not correct for generic family I will change it to Fantasy,
however, I am not sure you see Serif in the file can you confirm that is what
you see in the review?
Again I ask this because I am concerned we are not working with the same file?

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list