[Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Oct 17 17:55:23 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |ozamosi at flukkost.nu
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-10-17 13:55:21 EDT ---
It is with great pleasure that I can declare this version golden. Nice work!

᧱᧱᧱ APPROVED ᧱᧱᧱

You can now continue from:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a

If you need sponsorship in the packager group, you can ping me after another of
your submissions reaches the “approved” stage.

I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package other
fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our
organisation on the fonts mailing list.

Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool.

⇒ REASSIGNING

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list