Problems detected in the chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts rawhide package!
Nicolas Mailhot
nim at arekh.okg.redhat.com
Thu Oct 29 21:39:22 UTC 2009
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts package:
SRPM RPM 7 17
chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts 3 3
Total 3 3
7. Fonts that declare non-WWS compliant styles
☛ This WWS-like test checks if font styles use the “Width Weight Slant” naming
convention¹. As noted by Adobe the CSS family model is less than ideal, but
it's a standard and applications expect it².
Since our applications do not workaround bad font naming with dynamic
renaming heuristics, achieving consistent style naming that can be used in
CSS/web oriented applications requires fixing face naming directly in the
font files. For this reason we test font style naming separately from font
family naming, and do not support complex weight abbreviations and
suffixes³.
To pass this test make sure your style names do not include any qualifier
not defined in the WWS whitepaper¹, and that “Width”, “Weight” or “Slant”
are defined only once. Any other qualifier belongs in the font family name.
If one your font files is listed here please ask its upstream to fix its
naming so it does not need further reprocessing. And in the meanwhile patch
it (if it is available in sfd form) or add a fontconfig rule to your
package to hide the problem⁴.
¹ http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx
http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Font%20names.pdf
² http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/atypi2006/CSS%20&%20OT%2015.pdf
³ As defined in the end of the WWS renaming algorithm described in the
Microsoft whitepaper.
⁴ cf the “fontpackages” remapping template; unfortunately this workaround
won't fix problems for non-fontconfig applications, or when
interoperating with other systems.
17. Fonts with partial script coverage
☛ Some font files included in the package are missing only a few glyphs to be
accepted by fontconfig as covering one or several scripts. Therefore they
could be made useful to more people with only a little effort.
To check a font file script coverage, run fc-query with FC_DEBUG=256 and
look for lines like: script-id¹(number) { list-of-unicode-codepoints }
For example “mi(2) { 1e34 1e35 }” means fontconfig will accept the tested
file for Maori if codepoints 1e34 and 1e35 are added.
If you feel fontconfig is requiring a glyph which is not strictly necessary
for a particular script, report the problem upstream².
¹ http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php
² https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=fontconfig
Please take the appropriate measures to fix the chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts package.
I will warn you again if I find problems next time I am ran.
Your friendly QA robot,
--
repo-font-audit
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.tar.xz
Type: application/x-xz-compressed-tar
Size: 18744 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fonts-bugs/attachments/20091029/8b335839/attachment.bin
More information about the fonts-bugs
mailing list