[Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Sep 22 05:55:35 UTC 2009

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-09-22 01:55:34 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > 2. a foo-fangsong-ti-fonts subpackage, 
> bitmap-cjk-fonts has only fansongti fonts file, should we change it name?
> like bitmap-cjk-fangsongti-fonts

I'd not mention the cjk bit at all

> > Also
> > - it would be probably cleaner to package the ucs fonts in a ucs-fixed-fonts
> > package instead of hiding their origin in a collection package
> can you elaborate more on this, which font exactly?  

The readme says fixed is a copy of 

If we packaged it today it'd end up in a ucs-fonts or 
ucs-fixed-fonts srpm, not something else entirely.

Also as Jens wrote we need to de-duplicate with xorg-x11-fonts, but
xorg-x11-fonts is another package that needs reorganisation

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list