[Bug 525627] New: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results.

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Sep 25 06:36:58 UTC 2009

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results.


           Summary: [kn_IN][CodePoint] "U+0CE[2-3]" have error results.
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: i18n
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: pango
        AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, xinsun at redhat.com
        Depends on: 501416
    Classification: Fedora
    Target Release: ---
          Clone Of: 501416

Clone for Rawhide (Fedora 12) with following Package:

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #501416 +++

Description of problem:
When inputing "U+0CE2"  ೢ  or "U+0CE3"   ೣ  in gedit, the results were wrong.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge
2.Input "U+0CE2" or "U+0CE3" in gedit.

Actual results:
The result are 
U+0CE2  ೢ 
U+0CE3  ೣ  
and they are different from the correct image.

Expected results:
Please see the attachment: 0CE2.png  and U+0CE3.png

--- Additional comment from xinsun at redhat.com on 2009-05-18 23:03:07 EDT ---

Created an attachment (id=344547)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344547)

--- Additional comment from xinsun at redhat.com on 2009-05-18 23:03:31 EDT ---

Created an attachment (id=344548)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344548)

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list