[Bug 568229] New: License tag doesn't matches the actual license.

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Feb 25 04:30:43 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: License tag doesn't matches the actual license.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229

           Summary: License tag doesn't matches the actual license.
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: smc-fonts
        AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: fonts-bugs at lists.fedoraproject.org,
                    psatpute at redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora
    Target Release: ---


Description of problem:
the spec file says smc-suruma-fonts is licensed under GPLv3+ with exceptions,
but COPYING.txt in the archive doesn't mention about any '+'.
also smc-anjalioldlipi-fonts is licensed under GPLv3+ with exceptions, but
COPYING.txt says:
you are free do do anything (free as in free-speech). for more info contact:
blahblahblah


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
smc-fonts-04.2-5.fc13

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list