[Bug 1014065] non-free trademark problem

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 28 21:39:44 UTC 2014


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
                 CC|                            |tcallawa at redhat.com
         Resolution|---                         |NOTABUG
        Last Closed|                            |2014-01-28 16:39:44

--- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> ---
Ugh. I am not a fan of how Canonical handles this, but I think it is reasonable
to infer from Trademarks-Readme.txt that their use of their trademark in the
font name is permissible (mostly because of the OFL license also in play).
Closing this as NOTABUG.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Oh9f9tEV0W&a=cc_unsubscribe

More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list