[Bug 1110646] woff file missing on purpose?

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110646



--- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org> ---
(In reply to Petr Vobornik from comment #1)
> It was intentionally left out from fontawesome-fonts package because of
> fedora fonts packaging policy.

ok. Didn't know that.

> I'm actually not sure if it would be OK to include it (and .eot, .svg
> variants) to the *-web package. If so, it would also require a symlink or
> something to the .ttf file otherwise the .ttf link would be broken. 
> 
> The *-web package might require even more love. For instance the directory
> name with version in it is not really good. 
> 
> Also the "css" dir should probably be in "/usr/share/web-assets/fontawesome"
> [1].
> 
> If it's possible, I suggest to use font definition as follows:
> 
> @font-face {
>   font-family: 'FontAwesome';
>   src:  url('@{fa-font-path}/fontawesome-webfont.ttf?v=@{fa-version}')
> format('truetype');
>   font-weight: normal;
>   font-style: normal;
> }

ipython has a .less file and seems to generate a .min.css file from that.
I'll need to see to maybe regenerate the .min.css file, then your suggestion
from above should be "found" automatically. As they currently have that woff
file around, the .min.css generating script seems to automatically at it too.

Thanks!

I guess this can be closed then, if the woff file is indeed missing on
purpose...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xwYJasXPcT&a=cc_unsubscribe