[Bug 1138330] Review Request: shadowsintolight-fonts - Shadows Into Light fonts by Kimberly Geswein

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Sep 9 15:32:31 UTC 2014


--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> ---
We got naming issue resolved as "we don't need to add `google-` prefix". 


+ Package builds fine in mock in F22

- rpmlint on generated rpms gave output
shadowsintolight-fonts.src: E: specfile-error warning: line 48: second %files
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

- source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
=> Don't know how to download source archive

+ License is OFL and included in its own text file OFL.txt

- fontconfig file looks good

+ follows fonts packaging guidelines except additional %files

1) if you execute
rpm -E %_font_pkg

you will see this macro already added %files. so you should remove %files
written explicitly in spec file.

2) use cursive instead of handwriting in fontconfig file see more about this in

3) How do you created source archive? Maybe you should add comment above
Source0: tag and write how one can obtain same tarball

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jwoeOFwARJ&a=cc_unsubscribe

More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list