[Bug 1187337] Review Request: sil-coval-fonts - font derived from sans-serif

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 3 15:25:22 UTC 2015


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187337

Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> ---
Some suggestions:

1) Drop the sil prefix. This font does not look to be published on
http://scripts.sil.org website so "sil" as a foundry cannot be used.

2) As fonts do get updates without getting their metadata updated. I suggest
always to use maximum for versioning like if font provides version number then
use it. Also, use the date on which you downloaded source. So consider this as
a post-release snapshot package as given in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages

If you look at http://openfontlibrary.org/en/font/bretan page, you can clearly
see last updated date given as well as history also shows same zip archive name
is used in past.

So, your release tag can be either
Release: 1.20150122%{?dist}
or today's date as you downloaded source today
Release: 1.20150203%{?dist}

But, considering all these facts I will say for now use "1.20150122" as updated
date is specified on website. If it was not there we should use current date.

3) fontconfig file should say "sans-serif" and not "serif"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CzcLpRz3xk&a=cc_unsubscribe


More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list