[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 6 17:34:12 UTC 2015
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Dieter <jdieter at lesbg.com> ---
(In reply to Mohammed Isam from comment #16)
> (In reply to Jonathan Dieter from comment #14)
> > Mohammad, the problem is that the spec link still points to the old spec
> > file. I've downloaded the srpm and run some preliminary checks. Thanks for
> > fixing the items Carlos listed, but you also have %files being listed twice
> > for each subpackage because %_font_pkg automatically creates a %files
> > section for a font.
>
> Hi Jonathan
> I am a little perplexed here. If I remove the %files sections, rpmbuild
> complains about finding (Installed but unpackaged files) and terminates in
> error. Still, it is working with the current spec file, how is it possible?
> Furthermore, when I run (rpm -qpl) on the font packages, it lists the files
> correctly (with no repeated files). Should I remove the %files sections from
> my spec? If yes, how to solve the rpmbuild panic error?
The problem is that the manpages aren't packaged by %_font_pkg but are listed
in the %files sections. I would suggest dropping both the man and info pages
as they're really not necessary for a font. I checked a couple of other Fedora
fonts and they don't contain man or info pages.
If you remove the man and info pages, then you can also remove all of the
%files sections except -common
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=U2lhUvgUGF&a=cc_unsubscribe
More information about the fonts-bugs
mailing list