[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Feb 9 17:24:04 UTC 2015
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090
--- Comment #36 from Mohammed Isam <mohammed_isam1984 at yahoo.com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Dieter from comment #35)
> Package Review
> ==============
> [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/fonts,
> /etc/fonts/conf.d, /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail,
> /usr/share/fontconfig, /etc/fonts
>
> Please add Requires: fontpackages-filesystem to the -common subpackage
>
I added the Requires line to the spec. I don't need to add the individual
ownerships to the %files directory, do I?
> [!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
>
> Note: %defattr present but not needed
Not fixed. Honestly I don't get it. My %files section doesn't contain any
%defattr?
>
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>
> Package license and license included in tarball is GPLv3+, but,
> according
> to ttname.log, licenses in ttf files are all SIL OFL 1.1. Since you're
> also upstream for this package, I'd recommend sticking with SIL OFL 1.1.
>
Added the OFL license file (actually, three files according to the OFL
directions). Removed the GPL file and updated the License field in the spec.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3bUp7EGdgT&a=cc_unsubscribe
More information about the fonts-bugs
mailing list