[Bug 1181725] Re-Review Request (epel5): fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181725



--- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de> ---
Do we really need the re-review (that nobody seems to want to take care of)?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
says "To unretire a EPEL branch if the package is still in Fedora, no re-review
is required.". I would prefer if we could
just proceed to get the package back...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gJF9BechqB&a=cc_unsubscribe