[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 7 09:33:33 UTC 2015


Parag <pnemade at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
              Flags|fedora-cvs+                 |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #23 from Parag <pnemade at redhat.com> ---
Package Change Request
Package Name: fontpackages
New Branches: EL-5
Owners: pnemade

I am requesting this based on conversation that it is fine to un-retire this in

<paragan> tyll_, do you know what can be the reason to retire fontpackages in
el5? All I see the dead.package which says removal due to rpmlint but rpmlint
is not removed from el5
<tyll_> paragan: I added rpmlint again because it was required to fix the EPEL5
<tyll_> paragan: but this was after all depending packages were retired
<paragan> tyll, can I unretire fontpackages in el5 then?
<tyll> paragan: yes

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZSSIKY45FL&a=cc_unsubscribe

More information about the fonts-bugs mailing list