Font package naming guidelines

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Hi,

Since there has been no more remarks on the clarified font package
naming rules discussed as part of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes_(2008-11-08)

I've queued the following for approval FPC-side:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2008-12-22)

Except for the comps changes which seem not baked yet, that concludes
the fonts-related guidelines changes and clarifications that were
proposed for F11.

Sincerely,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fonts/attachments/20081222/5814e44f/attachment.bin