fontconfig questions

[Paul Lange]

> I'm not sure that:
> "the width and style is reminiscent of Luxi Sans, Lucida Sans, Tahoma,
> and Andale Sans UI" is sufficient to mark the font as a valid substitute
> for those fonts. So far we've only marked this way fonts that were
> clearly derivatives of other fonts, or that claimed same (not
> reminiscent) metrics.

OK, I removed the substitution rules.

> > I set the fontconfig-prefix of the sans-serif one to 61 (only latin) and
> > of the monospace to 64 (only latin, only regular). Any comments on this?
> 
> You can probably be more conservative with sans-serif

Done this to and submitted a review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527

regards, 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fonts/attachments/20090206/99f286e0/attachment.bin