fontforge update for f12?

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Mon Feb 1 17:34:35 UTC 2010


On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:40:08 +0100
"Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> wrote:

> 
> 
> Le Lun 1 février 2010 00:04, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> > Greetings.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > What would folks think about me updating fontforge in f12?
> 
> It would be very nice if we could have a fontforge stable enough to
> keep a full release. I really hate it when font packages and the
> fontforge used to build them do not match in a distro.

Yeah. Agreed. 

> However, it seems that's not the case here. So if you feel updating is
> necessary for bug-fixing, I'm OK with it. However, please do a
> scratch build of all the packages that use fontforge (and run
> repo-font-audit on it) before pushing to f12. regressions are worse
> than known bugs.
> 
> (just my opinion, others on the list may differ)

Well, I can also just see about backporting the patch I need. 
It might not be that bad... 

Will keep the list posted. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fonts/attachments/20100201/d570dec6/attachment.bin 


More information about the fonts mailing list