fontforge in f15

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Mon Mar 21 16:23:22 UTC 2011


On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:22:30 +0100
"Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> wrote:

> That would be nice but I'd really like the existing font packages to
> be rebuilt against this version to make sure there is no regression
> and someone who tries to rebuild a fedora font package with the
> fedora fontconfig gets the same results as us.

Sure, thats the hard part. ;) 

> And that needs someone to notify package owners, give them the time
> to rebuild their packages if they want to, rebuild in their stead
> otherwise.

Do we have a handly list or workflow for this? 

Would someone be willing to take this on? 

> BTW : it's really nice to see all the fontconfig bugs squashed
> upstream those past months because Fedora people reported them
> (sometimes with patches), keep up the good work!

Agreed! :) 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fonts/attachments/20110321/bc0efffb/attachment.bin 


More information about the fonts mailing list