Dropping RFN from Red Hat-SIL-OFL-licensor fonts (was: Overpass Fonts licensing)
Richard Fontana
rfontana at redhat.com
Wed Dec 12 02:55:14 UTC 2012
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:31:49PM +0530, pravin.d.s at gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On 11 December 2012 12:21, Richard Fontana <rfontana at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:52:06PM +0530, pravin.d.s at gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Lohit is actively used as a Web fonts in some of the projects. Point
> raised by
> > Dave is valid one that Web fonts need reproducing/regenerating fonts in
> other
> > than .ttf format and RFN requirement make unusable in such case. So
> should
> > Lohit upstream consider dropping RFN (reserve font name) requirement and
> add it
> > in COPYRIGHT file as suggested by Dave?
I agree with this proposal.
Therefore, it seems to me, we can and should drop the Reserved Font
Name from Lohit Fonts, Liberation Fonts 2.0, and Overpass Fonts.
I do not consider it necessary to add any trademark notices at this time.
- Richard
More information about the fonts
mailing list