Dropping RFN from Red Hat-SIL-OFL-licensor fonts (was: Overpass Fonts licensing)

Richard Fontana rfontana at redhat.com
Wed Dec 12 02:55:14 UTC 2012


On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:31:49PM +0530, pravin.d.s at gmail.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11 December 2012 12:21, Richard Fontana <rfontana at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>     On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:52:06PM +0530, pravin.d.s at gmail.com wrote:
>     >
>     > Lohit is actively used as a Web fonts in some of the projects. Point
>     raised by
>     > Dave is valid one that Web fonts need reproducing/regenerating fonts in
>     other
>     > than .ttf format and RFN requirement make unusable in such case. So
>     should
>     > Lohit upstream consider dropping RFN (reserve font name) requirement and
>     add it
>     > in COPYRIGHT file as suggested by Dave?

I agree with this proposal. 

Therefore, it seems to me, we can and should drop the Reserved Font
Name from Lohit Fonts, Liberation Fonts 2.0, and Overpass Fonts.

I do not consider it necessary to add any trademark notices at this time.

- Richard



More information about the fonts mailing list