2 versions of alogg

Wart wart at kobold.org
Fri Apr 28 14:45:54 UTC 2006


My only recommendation would be to send your changes upstream when
you're done so that they can potentially incorporate them into the code.

--Mike

Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Well since no one has commented on this I'm going to implement things as
> described below.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 
> 
> Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
>>Hi all,
>>
>>Quoting myself from:
>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625
>>
>>---
>>
>>Before I forget the ugly name is because there are 2 alogg libraries out
>>there, one which is called just alogg and one which is called AllegroOGG
>>but still use alogg as soname. I hope we never need the other alogg
>>otherwise I see a problem, but with this name atleast its clear which
>>alogg this is:
>> http://lyrian.obnix.com/alogg/
>> http://nekros.freeshell.org/delirium/alogg.html
>>
>>---
>>
>>Thanks for the review! I've not imported this sofar, because the fact
>>that debian has the other alogg packaged worries me, this means that the
>>other one is used by some free software too, so sooner or later we will
>>need to package it too. I think I'll just start packaging the other one
>>right away so that I can find any conflicts now and come up with a
>>resolution, before a bunch of packages depends on one or the other.
>>
>>
>>---
>>
>>So there we are 2 different ogg support for use with allegro support
>>libraries both installing:
>>/usr/lib/libalogg.so
>>
>>One of them installs:
>>alogg.h
>>
>>And the other:
>>alogg/alogg.h
>>
>>Which also seems like an accident waiting to happen. I'm thinking of
>>solving this by:
>>-give AllegroOGG a new soname: libAllegroOGG.so, or should I give them
>> both a new name, and in that case what should I use for alogg?
>>-putting all the header files of both in seperate dirs under include:
>> /usr/include/allog/(alogg/alogg.h)
>> /usr/include/AllegroOGG/(allogg.h)
>>-modifying allog-config todo the right thing for alogg
>>-use pkgconfig for AllegroOgg
>>-patch AllegroOGG using programs to use pkgconfig. Currently only raidem
>> can use AllegroOGG (I have a new version ready which adds ogg support
>> as a replacement for the stripped out mp3 support, giving raidem its
>> background music back).
>>
>>
>>So does this sound like a plan if not, what do you suggest?
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Hans
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-games-list mailing list
> Fedora-games-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list




More information about the games mailing list