FreeSCI

[Hans de Goede]

Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Since I've already got it to a working state, I may as well submit it for
> review.  If it gets reviewed and added before the requisite ScummVM
> release, that's gravy.  If not, it was still worth it to me to package it
> for my own use.
> 

Wouldn't it be better to package nagi, as that is more complete and prefered by 
qt-agibuilder if I understand things correctly, then you also have a good 
reason to ship it with Fedora, since it (nagi) then is a development tool.

Regards,

Hans