[Bug 982204] Review Request: elm - The Elm language module

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204

Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |petersen at redhat.com



--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> ---
Some more comments:

- Perhaps the Summary could be more descriptive.
  How about: "Functional reactive web programming lanaguage"?

- Latest upstream version is now 0.9.0.2 though it needs union-find.

- You will probably have to ExcludeArch armv7hl for now since pandoc
  refuses to build there currently with ghc-7.6.3 and llvm-3.3 (f20).
  Hopefully that should improve in F21 when we move to ghc-7.8.

(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #1)
> I think it might be better to call the package "Elm".
> 
> At least cabal-rpm currently assumes that name = pkg_name
> for BinLib packages like this and it is also recommended
> in the Haskell Guidelines.  (Failing that probably need to replace
> %{name} with %{pkg_name} in various places in the spec file.)

Well it seems to build and install okay here but I still
recommend using "Elm" since it is more consistent and
I think some of the haskell-sig script might get confused
if the package and hackage names are different.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PuHsU2Y0kT&a=cc_unsubscribe