[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Apr 6 05:56:22 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175





--- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com>  2009-04-06 01:56:22 EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i586).
koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1279006
+ rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is 
ibus-table-extraphrase.src:54: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ibus-table-extraphrase.pc
==> is this really needed?
+ source files match upstream url
2dd3e5cf76c8fa36b17a6ade737e0801  ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.20090327.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlet used.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Not a GUI App.  

Suggestions:
1) Add Changelog in upstream tarball. When you add it then you can add this
Changelog file as %doc

2) can you check if ibus-table-extraphrase.pc is really needed?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the i18n-bugs mailing list