[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 578015] l10n-font-template.conf doesn't work as expected

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578015

--- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> 2010-04-01 03:53:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Ok, if it doesn t really work, I ll change it when I m back from vacation next
> week

Thanks. to make this clearer more, as a result, this change will puts more
gravity to the priority prefix to determine which fonts is better, because
strong binding only overrides this list after that and we use that for the case
only where AA font could replaces BB font say. and it works expectedly as long
as we test the language properly.

> Do you want commit acces to fontpackages so you can contribute enhancements
> directly in the future ? I hate being the single point of failure there    

That would be really nice :) I continued the development of the fontconfig
audit stuff recently and nearly ready to see if config files contains
authorized rules against templates. I'm keen to contribute this audit program,
but anyway.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.