[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 619395] Review Request: mozc - Opensourced Google Japanese Input

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jul 31 18:48:40 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619395

--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-07-31 14:48:40 EDT ---
First of all would you clarify the following?

./data/dictionary/README.txt
  - Well, mozc says the overall license is BSD, however 
    - this file (./data/dictionary/README.txt) says that 
      the volaburaly set is taken from ipadic, and 
      the license of ipadic is not the same as BSD.
      ! Fedora admits that the license of ipadic is free, 
        however is different from BSD at least in that the 
        compatibility with GPL is currently unclear:
        http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing

    - Also some other words seems added to the dictionary in the
      tarball. Maybe newly added words are licensed under BSD,
      however it seems unclear to me.

    Would you check under what license the dictionaries in mozc are
    actually licensed?

./third_party/rx/v1_0rc2/README
  - This is under ASL 2.0.
  ! By the way, there are two third-party products included in mozc
    tarball (gyp, rx). Generally using bundled libraries is discouraged
    on Fedora and it is recommended to seperate such bundled libraries
   
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Bundling_of_multiple_projects
    Would you create seperated review request for these (if these
    are really needed)?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the i18n-bugs mailing list