[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 619395] Review Request: mozc - Opensourced Google Japanese Input
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jul 31 18:48:40 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619395
--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-07-31 14:48:40 EDT ---
First of all would you clarify the following?
./data/dictionary/README.txt
- Well, mozc says the overall license is BSD, however
- this file (./data/dictionary/README.txt) says that
the volaburaly set is taken from ipadic, and
the license of ipadic is not the same as BSD.
! Fedora admits that the license of ipadic is free,
however is different from BSD at least in that the
compatibility with GPL is currently unclear:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
- Also some other words seems added to the dictionary in the
tarball. Maybe newly added words are licensed under BSD,
however it seems unclear to me.
Would you check under what license the dictionaries in mozc are
actually licensed?
./third_party/rx/v1_0rc2/README
- This is under ASL 2.0.
! By the way, there are two third-party products included in mozc
tarball (gyp, rx). Generally using bundled libraries is discouraged
on Fedora and it is recommended to seperate such bundled libraries
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Bundling_of_multiple_projects
Would you create seperated review request for these (if these
are really needed)?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the i18n-bugs
mailing list