[fedora-india] libkqueue - Packaging wishlist

[Aditya Patawari]

Hi Rahul,

I have an issue with %configure macro.

When I do "./configure --prefix=/usr", it builds perfectly but if I
use %configure build fails for 64 bit. After examining the log of both
the build I found that %configure passes a lot of parameters while
"./configure --prefix=/usr" does not. How can I fix this error?


Failed build's log:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2906677&name=build.log
Successful Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2906646

Aditya Patawari
http://blog.adityapatawari.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adimania
India



On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Aditya Patawari <adimania at gmail.com> wrote:
> Packaged! Need someone to review it.
>
> Bugzilla Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684446
>
> --
> Aditya Patawari
> http://blog.adityapatawari.com/
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adimania
> India
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Aditya Patawari <adimania at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have informed upstream regarding an error of undeclared variable.
>> The post is under moderation. I'll update the url as soon as it is
>> moderated.
>>
>> --
>> Aditya Patawari
>> http://blog.adityapatawari.com/
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adimania
>> India
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2011 08:45 PM, Aditya Patawari wrote:
>>>> Hi Rahul,
>>>>
>>>> It is not written anywhere that GPL is being used but I found the
>>>> notice below in one of the files:
>>>>
>>>> #
>>>> # Copyright (c) 2009 Mark Heily <mark at heily.com>
>>>> #
>>>> # Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
>>>> # purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
>>>> # copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
>>>> #
>>>> # THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
>>>> # WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
>>>> # MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR
>>>> # ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
>>>> # WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
>>>> # ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
>>>> # OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
>>>> #
>>>>
>>>> Should I assume it is GPLed or write to the developer about the license?
>>>
>>> This is not GPL at all.  Usually libraries are not licensed under GPL.
>>> This is a MIT license,  specifically old style with a legal disclaimer.
>>>
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT#Old_Style_with_legal_disclaimer_2
>>>
>>> Use the license tag "MIT" for this variant.
>>>
>>> Rahul
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> india mailing list
>>> india at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/india
>>>
>>
>