[fedora-india] libkqueue - Packaging wishlist
adimania at gmail.com
Mon Mar 14 07:48:18 UTC 2011
I have an issue with %configure macro.
When I do "./configure --prefix=/usr", it builds perfectly but if I
use %configure build fails for 64 bit. After examining the log of both
the build I found that %configure passes a lot of parameters while
"./configure --prefix=/usr" does not. How can I fix this error?
Failed build's log:
Successful Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2906646
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Aditya Patawari <adimania at gmail.com> wrote:
> Packaged! Need someone to review it.
> Bugzilla Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684446
> Aditya Patawari
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Aditya Patawari <adimania at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have informed upstream regarding an error of undeclared variable.
>> The post is under moderation. I'll update the url as soon as it is
>> Aditya Patawari
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2011 08:45 PM, Aditya Patawari wrote:
>>>> Hi Rahul,
>>>> It is not written anywhere that GPL is being used but I found the
>>>> notice below in one of the files:
>>>> # Copyright (c) 2009 Mark Heily <mark at heily.com>
>>>> # Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
>>>> # purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
>>>> # copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
>>>> # THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
>>>> # WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
>>>> # MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR
>>>> # ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
>>>> # WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
>>>> # ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
>>>> # OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
>>>> Should I assume it is GPLed or write to the developer about the license?
>>> This is not GPL at all. Usually libraries are not licensed under GPL.
>>> This is a MIT license, specifically old style with a legal disclaimer.
>>> Use the license tag "MIT" for this variant.
>>> india mailing list
>>> india at lists.fedoraproject.org
More information about the india