Fwd: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] A cvs space for the Usability Sig

[Warren Togami]

Damien Durand wrote:
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Damien Durand* <splinux at fedoraproject.org 
> <mailto:splinux at fedoraproject.org>>
> Date: 27 août 2006 12:18
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-infrastructure-list] A cvs space for the Usability Sig
> To: "Patrick W. Barnes" <nman64 at n-man.com <mailto:nman64 at n-man.com>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> "temporary storage" aren't the good words, I'm actually starting an 
> application for "Fedora Usability" called "fusability". It's like 
> bug-buddy but allow to produce usability repports. Yes actually I can 
> host this on a my web access because it's not usable.
> 
> Bugzilla allow to conserve patchs or other? I don't think that it's the 
> best solution but now that can be acceptable because the Usability Sigs 
> has an existance of 2 weeks.
> 
> The "Usability packages" is a good idea, We can produce "unofficial" 
> packages for testing the application  massively...
> 
> I'm agree with you, cvs is not essential actually because usability is 
> too young but that can be good for a efficient and productive work. Send 
> the sources by mail etc... is not really great.

If your goal is unofficial side packages for usability, it may be best 
to wait for the next generation VCS that we hope to deploy before FC7. 
It will be one of the distributed VCS, which is extremely well suited 
for these kind of temporary branches.  It could be done then with far 
less ugliness.

Please do the best you can with Bugzilla, Wiki's and 3rd hosted space 
until then.

Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com