[Fedora-infrastructure-list] Re: coverity code checker in Extras

Ulrich Drepper drepper at redhat.com
Thu Aug 31 15:33:23 UTC 2006


Warren Togami wrote:
> Same thing in principle.  Why does Coverity need to be in our build
> system?  It could very well work asynchronously outside of Fedora from
> our SRPMS.

If you don't do it in the build system there is no guarantee that the
tests actually test the same thing as the code which is shipped.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20060831/4a513031/attachment.bin 


More information about the infrastructure mailing list