Web server torturing

Ahmed Kamal email.ahmedkamal at googlemail.com
Thu Dec 7 14:36:57 UTC 2006


Please note that there will only be one client connecting to the web-server.
I guess (if we can't get a separate dump machine), it would be better to
dump on the client machine, than on the server machine where the disk will
probably be active.

OTOH, I'm not sure what kind of information would be interesting to us from
a packet dump in this case?

On 12/7/06, Jeffrey C. Ollie <jeff at ocjtech.us> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 16:07 +0200, Ahmed Kamal wrote:
> >
> > - A kind of load monitoring tool we could/should use (other than
> > "top")
>
> If we could coordinate things with the crew at the hosting site, it
> would be interesting to capture all of the packets between the server
> and clients during the test.  There are some tools in wireshark that
> would be useful for analyzing the results of the test.  For best
> performance you'd want to have a separate system capturing traffic that
> was being mirrored by the switch.  Second best would be to dump the
> packet captures to the web server's disk, but I would think that the I/O
> caused by that would affect the test.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20061207/7fe422a9/attachment.html 


More information about the infrastructure mailing list