[Fedora-infrastructure-list] Officers

Damian Myerscough damian.myerscough at gmail.com
Wed Jul 19 18:58:12 UTC 2006


Yea Mike Sounds good, most of the security updates I have been doing via RHN as
its quick and easy and I am alerted via email when a security update
is needed :) Currently all the systems are up to date accept
proxy2.fedora.phx.redhat.com. Someone has set up2date not to apply the
kernel patch.

On 7/19/06, Nils Breunese <nils at breun.nl> wrote:
> Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> > I could see a use for the following officers:
> > ticketmaster
> > updates
> > dba
> > noc (nagios/cacti)
> > accounting
> > VCS
> > external (someone who can coordinate with the other non-infrastructure
> > teams on things)
> >
> > I'm thinking that officers should be limited to people that have been
> > a part of the team for months and have a good record in the true sense
> > of a meritocracy.  I'm also under the opinion that some systems could
> > have multiple officers.  (for example I could very easily see Warren
> > and myself as contacts for VCS).
> >
> > Anyway I'm throwing it out there.  What do you guys think?  Am I
> > trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist?
>
> I'm new here, but it sounds like a pretty good idea.
>
> Nils Breunese.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
>
>
>
>




More information about the infrastructure mailing list