Features for Fedora Project PBX 1.0

[Jeffrey C. Ollie]

On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 03:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >>
> >> Crazy idea:
> >>
> >> Voice support for end users by other end users.
> > 
> > I'm not going to say no to this, but I am going to say that if this is a 
> > service we are serious about offering, it will take $$.  Whereas the 
> > contributor only bridge can be made available now with our current 
> > resources.
> 
> It will take $$ as in we need to talk to Max Spevack and get more funds 
> or we need to make users pay for the service?

I can't see Fedora trying to make users pay for a support service like
that, especially when it's staffed by volunteers.  While it would take
some resources, I don't think that it would be an extremely huge one.  A
server or two and some dedicated bandwidth would do it I think (so that
downloads of Fedora Release N don't kill the quality of your VoIP
connections).

The idea has merit, I think that it's something more suited for Fedora
Project PBX 2.0 though.

Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20070807/a61ac263/attachment.bin