Mirrormanager thoughts

[Jeffrey C. Ollie]

On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 09:42 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 08:34 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On 1/1/07, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch at dell.com> wrote:
> > > Before we unleash it to we'll need to tie this into the Fedora Account System
> > > for user authentication, but that can be tackled in parallel to the
> > > rest of the system development.
> > 
> > There were some discussions that this should not tie into the Fedora
> > Account System though I can't remember what arguments there were for
> > or against, anyone remember?
> 
> mirror admins don't need to sign a CLA or anything else to be mirror
> admins. And a fair number of them may resent it.

Does signing the CLA need to be a prerequisite for getting an account in
the Fedora Account System?  In addition to mirror admins, that would be
useful for the hosted projects site.

Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20070102/8e170736/attachment.bin