Infrastructure SCM

[Paulo Santos]

Same as me, any is good.

As Seth git is alphabetically first so +1 git

On 7/2/07, Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:10AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > starting this up again.  Since we want it to be distributed we're left
> with
> > either git or mercurial.  Can I take a non-binding vote from the people
> on
> > this list as to a preference on each?  Remember, our needs in
> > Infrastructure are really pretty simple, so at a glance.  What do you
> guys
> > think?
> >
> >
> > git:
> >
> > mercurial:
>
> I don't care either way.  Mercurial has been treating me well for bodhi
> development, but I've also been interested in learning git.
>
> luke
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20070702/1ec58146/attachment.html