Our SCM
Paulo Santos
paulo.banon at googlemail.com
Mon Jun 18 19:04:08 UTC 2007
+1 on the cleanup
Regarding, changing the actually SCM, do we need anything that CVS doesnt
offer ?
If we do, then lets discuss options, if we dont, then let's stick with it.
Paulo
On 6/18/07, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> So there's a great deal of discussion about the Fedora Packaging SCM its
> time we look at the Infrastructure SCM. We now host cvs, hg, git and
> svn. For our configuration management we're using for our development.
> For many items we've actually created hosted sites (smolt, mirror
> manager) seems appropriate for these project which, in theory, are
> useful to others. But what about some of our other development where a
> hosted project would be wasted? This would be like, kindofblue (our
> wiki theme) or a plone plugin. We're using cvs for this right now in
> the fedora repo. I think we should do some clean up on this repo but
> while we're doing its good to evaluate whether or not to move to
> something else or to continue using it.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20070618/de4d9505/attachment.html
More information about the infrastructure
mailing list