sub-optimal torrent for F9 Snapshot 1
Mike McGrath
mmcgrath at redhat.com
Mon Mar 31 22:30:32 UTC 2008
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, John Poelstra wrote:
> I'm finding trying to get Friday's snapshot of Fedora 9 to be very
> sub-optimal... 62 hours estimated to go after already timing out once. I've
> got two peers and one seed :( I'll probably get it by time the next snapshot
> is ready :)
>
> Is this happening to others?
>
> Is this really a viable way to put out *weekly* snapshots?
>
> Is hosting jigdo templates a possibility? In my situation it would work well
> because I mirror the rawhide trees locally--yes I realize this begs the
> question of why I need the snapshot if I already mirror rawhide, but I'm
> curious if it fails to install for me just as rawhide has for the past three
> days.
Looks like this is actually releng's call as they decided to host jigdo
for the last beta. I'm not sure if we ever got it actually working right
though.
-Mike
More information about the infrastructure
mailing list