Removal of old projects from fedorahosted.
Mike McGrath
mmcgrath at redhat.com
Wed Sep 10 14:57:44 UTC 2008
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 22:44 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > So it seems I'm alone here, if we have to keep everything forever, thats
> > what it'll be. I'll just have to see to it we have the resources and
> > backup materials in the future when that time comes. I have a question
> > and a suggestion for people.
> >
> > 1) What do we do with projects to which no owner or responsible party can
> > be found? This caused major headaches during the elvis move... headaches
> > we still have today. What would you have us do?
>
> I think the idea of making them read-only/owned by an "admin" type group
> seems reasonable at first blush. It doesn't get rid of all of the
> problems, but it does help with a number of them
>
> > 2) Right before we start removing projects is _not_ the time to discuss
> > the policy. When the policy is put in place... thats the time to discuss
> > it.
>
> I don't disagree at all. I must have missed the initial discussion in
> my sea of mail or I would have chimed in then :-/
>
no worries, I can admit to blowing my top last night, long day. We'll
figure something out. Taking a step back my core concerns are code to
which no one is responsible and what to do about that code. _especially_
if its still in use somewhere. It actually complicated the move away from
elvis quite a bit and I want to make sure that doesn't happen again.
We can look at that philosophically and practically.
-Mike
More information about the infrastructure
mailing list