Change Request - Elections

Mike McGrath mmcgrath at redhat.com
Mon Sep 22 14:26:45 UTC 2008


On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Nigel Jones wrote:

> On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:25 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 01:08 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > > Technically not directly covered in the Beta Freeze, but it's only
> > > running on app4 at the moment and the settings it's on now is okay for
> > > the infrequent use of casual browsing, but the Art team want to use it
> > > for the next 36 or so hours.
> > >
> > > Can I get a +1 to bump to the resources used during the FESCo/Board
> > > votes?
> >
> > Bump them to what?
>
> Err yeah, I boo-booed and forgot to include the diff.
>
> diff --git a/configs/web/applications/elections.conf
> b/configs/web/applications/elections.conf
> index 387f01f..4a11549 100644
> --- a/configs/web/applications/elections.conf
> +++ b/configs/web/applications/elections.conf
> @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ WSGIPythonOptimize 2
>
>  # To save resources during periods of no-elections (quite often - ~75%
> of the time)
>  # We can run less threads and processes.
> -#WSGIDaemonProcess elections threads=2 processes=4 user=apache
> display-name=elections
> -WSGIDaemonProcess elections threads=1 processes=1 user=apache
> display-name=elections
> +WSGIDaemonProcess elections threads=2 processes=4 user=apache
> display-name=elections
> +#WSGIDaemonProcess elections threads=1 processes=1 user=apache
> display-name=elections
>
> To be fair, it'd most likely be okay running at threads=2 processes=2,
> but I'm trying to stick with what I've used in the past with the freeze
> etc.

+1 from me.

	-Mike




More information about the infrastructure mailing list