Statistics problem

[Mike McGrath]

On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:40:40PM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:09:27PM +0800, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On 04/29/2009 08:20 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:17:55AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > >>> Maybe the cleanest solution is to count downloaded bytes and divide by
> > > >>> image size. That way you properly count ranged downloads.
> > > >> Command suggestions are very welcome.  I really don't have time to
> > > >> delve into this incredibly deeply at the moment.
> > > >
> > > > Could you post a small fragment of the raw logs? But it seems like all
> > > > we see are the primary redirects, possibly w/o noting ranges in the
> > > > logs. E.g. for better statistics the logs would need to capture the
> > > > ranges from the head as well.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think that information is not available, because no one (almost)
> > > downloads directly from the Fedora servers, only from the mirrors.
> > > Therefore, the real data, like range requests, etc., would only be on
> > > the mirror servers themselves, and not on the primary ones.
> >
> > Isn't a range request sent in the header of the HTTP request which
> > would hit the Fedora servers before being redirected?
>
> Can someone on the Infrastructure guru team help me pull some relevant
> lines from the logs, expurgating the IP address and any other
> identifying information so we're not running afoul of any privacy
> concerns?
>
255.255.255.255 - - [22/Mar/2009:23:59:44 +0000] "GET
/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Live/i686/F10-i686-Live.iso HTTP/1.1" 302
-"http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE
7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)"

Bam!

	-Mike