log1 filling up..

Jon Stanley jonstanley at gmail.com
Sat Jul 18 00:31:55 UTC 2009


Yeah I thought that had already been done. Would rather not compress
http logs from the proxies for 2009 if it can be avoided. Sorry for
the top post,on my CrackBerry :)

On 7/17/09, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote:
> The majority of the logs are
>
> 8579992 ./bastion2
> 12937952        ./cvs2
> 27913380        ./secondary1
> 28753276        ./192.168.1.14
> 31164048        ./192.168.1.25
> 36747548        ./proxy1
> 59465200        ./192.168.1.7
> 78840240        ./proxy2
>
>
> 12937612        ./cvs2/2009
> 26187812        ./192.168.1.14/2009
> 27904380        ./secondary1/2009
> 30327316        ./proxy1/2009
> 30495152        ./192.168.1.25/2009
> 54589944        ./192.168.1.7/2009
>
> Is it ok to compress older month logs 01/, 02/, 03/, 04, ?
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
>
> Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
> -- Robert Browning
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device




More information about the infrastructure mailing list