log1 filling up..
Jon Stanley
jonstanley at gmail.com
Sat Jul 18 00:31:55 UTC 2009
Yeah I thought that had already been done. Would rather not compress
http logs from the proxies for 2009 if it can be avoided. Sorry for
the top post,on my CrackBerry :)
On 7/17/09, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote:
> The majority of the logs are
>
> 8579992 ./bastion2
> 12937952 ./cvs2
> 27913380 ./secondary1
> 28753276 ./192.168.1.14
> 31164048 ./192.168.1.25
> 36747548 ./proxy1
> 59465200 ./192.168.1.7
> 78840240 ./proxy2
>
>
> 12937612 ./cvs2/2009
> 26187812 ./192.168.1.14/2009
> 27904380 ./secondary1/2009
> 30327316 ./proxy1/2009
> 30495152 ./192.168.1.25/2009
> 54589944 ./192.168.1.7/2009
>
> Is it ok to compress older month logs 01/, 02/, 03/, 04, ?
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
>
> Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
> -- Robert Browning
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
More information about the infrastructure
mailing list