DNSSEC and Geodns

Stephen John Smoogen smooge at gmail.com
Fri Nov 20 23:29:23 UTC 2009


On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
> Nothing's ever easy, is it?
>
> So I got pdns up and going this afternoon with it's geo back end.  It's
> working as expected and everything is good.  The problem is pdns's dnssec
> implementation is...  not particularly mature or really even usable AFAIK
> with geodns.
>
> Anyone out there doing both geo location and dnssec with their name
> servers?

Not really. Most places I know do not do dns-sec (either waiting until
.com/.org is signed or until its required) or if they are doing
dns-sec aren't doing geoip. The solutions that comes to mind would be
to have the geoip code in an unsigned sub-zone. Its not great but
until 2011 I don't see it being much better.


>        -Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
>



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.

Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning




More information about the infrastructure mailing list