fp.o content via IPv6
mmcgrath at redhat.com
Wed Sep 9 19:30:12 UTC 2009
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 09/09/2009 09:48 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > We could instead advertise www.ipv6.fp.o and make people choose to use
> > > v6 or not. Google does this today for exactly these reasons (failures
> > > elsewhere in the network we can't control). Kind of defeats the
> > > purpose though.
> > Why not do this and continue working on ipv6 on the rest of the systems?
> "rest of the systems" == rest of the world. could take a while :)
> This is precisely IPv6's catch-22: if providers don't implement IPv6, then
> end user networks won't get fixed. If end user networks don't get fixed,
> providers won't implement IPv6.
In fairness IPv6 is sort of a second class citizen atm. Between me,
domsch and the volunteers we've had, several hours of time in the last
week have been spent debugging connectivity issues wrt ipv6.
More information about the infrastructure