hosted to rhel6
Toshio Kuratomi
a.badger at gmail.com
Thu Apr 22 20:08:51 UTC 2010
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 07:48:44AM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> also gets us a bzr upgrade, which aiui is an incompatible on-disk
> format??? Toshio can you elaborate? The SCM versions that we pick up
> in RHEL6 are (all of these are in RHEL proper now):
>
> bzr-2.0.2-1.1.el6.x86_64
>
So... I've already upgrade EPEL-5 to bzr-2.1 which may be longer lived than
bzr-2.0 (it's in Ubuntu Lucid; their next long term release).
This means we're going to have to rebuild the EPEL-5 packages for Fedora
Infrastructure's EL-6 repository.
bzr-2.0 is not fully API compatible with bzr-2.1 is not fully API compat
with bzr-2.2(in beta). The bzr apps we're running right now work with
bzr-2.1, i'm not sure that there's a 2.0 branch for all of them.
The on-disk format is no problem -- bzr retains the ability to operate on
old on-disk formats. Once we have bzr-2.0 or greater on all released
Fedoras and in EPEL-5, though, I'm going to upgrade the ondisk format for
the bzr repositories on the server which will cause bzr-1.x clients to
break and people to need to run bzr upgrade on their checkouts. (launchpad
already uses the 2a format so most people already need to have a more modern
client).
-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20100422/c3a0be91/attachment.bin
More information about the infrastructure
mailing list