dev.fedoraproject.org

Xavier Lamien laxathom at fedoraproject.org
Sun Jul 18 12:34:06 UTC 2010


On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
> So it is probably time to have a dev.fedoraproject.org.  Why?  Well,
> toshio had mentioned having others do some of the 'sysadminy' tasks so
> developers can focus on development.
>
> Also Luke had an analogous request wrt community and staging but before I
> go setting things up some topics for discussion:
>
> 1) Security staging and production are identical.  Since production data
> regularly gets migrated to staging people that have access to one, might
> as well have access to the other.  Generally our staging environment is
> mostly used for integration work, some load work as well.
>
> 2) Should we run development from rpms that get edited (like live patches)
> or should we run them from scm(ish) checkouts.  I generally vote for the
> latter as it feels more useful in a development lifecycle.  But we should

+1 for scm chekouts
also save time that way.

> come up with a quick standard for how to store this stuff.  something like
> /srv/dev/

yeah, fine for me.

>
> 3) I don't want this to be all fancy.  All of our apps run in their own
> namespaces so we should be able to get by with one or two app dev servers
> and we should be able to use them without a reverse proxy.
>
> Questions comments?  It'd be nice to just throw them all together on a
> couple of hosts in their own namespace.  It'll help find issues with them
> playing together.

Well we could use them with something like "dev.fp.o/myapp" "dev.fp.o/myapp2"
Just like we're doing for admin.fp.o

Also have a subdomain dev is great. Maybe a home page would be good as well,
just my two cents.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB


More information about the infrastructure mailing list