any objections on installing htop?

[Ricky Elrod]

Alright, how does this look? +1 worthy? :)

--- a/manifests/services/global.pp
+++ b/manifests/services/global.pp
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ class global {
         "bind-utils",
         "man",
         "traceroute",
+        "htop",
     ]:
         ensure => installed,
     }


On Jun 20, 2010, at 9:37 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010, Ricky Elrod wrote:
>> 
>>> Yep, which is why I'm asking here. It's not a daemon or long-running service
>>> or anything, but I do understand what you're saying. And yes, I'm planning on
>>> getting some -main's to +1 it, but I was told the first step was throwing an email
>>> out on the list.
>>> 
>> 
>> If it doesn't pull any crazy deps in I'm not necessarly against it but
>> it's not clear to me what it buys us over the tools that are on there now.
>> You mentioned load (you can get with 'w').  CPU and RAM can both be
>> ordered by the top command already installed.
>> 
> 
> That seems like it would be useful to some, I'm not sure I would
> personally use it (I'm more of a sar man myself), but it's a non-suid tiny
> app that others might be able to use, fine by me.
> 
> 	-Mike
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure