Top 10 services/servers/etc

[Bassford John]

Ricky

assuming you send notifications as email a simple fix to tell that a nagios
notification came from a "specific server" is to just edit the comment
section in the password file for the account nagios is running as, usually
nagios

noc01
/etc/passwd
nagios:x:100:100:nagios-noc1:/home/nagios:/sbin/nologin

noc02
/etc/passwd
nagios:x:100:100:nagios-noc02:/home/nagios:/sbin/nologin

email would show

nagios-noc1  <nagios at noc01>
nagios-noc2  <nagios at noc02>

of course you could change your 'notification' template too..

am new to the list and looking to assist with fedora-infrastructure, and
thought I would start with an area I know (nagios), hopefully this is
helpful and starts me on my way of actually knowing how fpo nagios is setup
, so at some later date I could provide a more viable answer.

am jbass29503 on #fedora-admin

JB

On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 21:00:25 -0500
> Ricky Elrod <codeblock at elrod.me> wrote:
>
> > noc02 (nagios external) is running nagios 3, and I did
> > think of one thing that we should take a look at. In notifications
> > from noc02, it does not mention that the error originated from
> > noc02 anymore. I have no clue why.
> >
> > noc01.stg is a machine that was built as EL6 and is running
> > with my preliminary nagios puppet module, in
> > puppet/modules/nagios/* ... so config stuff should be editable
> > in that directory.
> >
> > As I've said numerous times, I am fairly confident that our nagios
> > config will work perfectly fine in 3, I'm more worried about things
> > like meetbot logs and zodbot. Let's get those tested on noc01.stg
> > and have /everything/ working so we can stick to smooge's deadline.
>
> I know zodbot was tested (we changed it's nick on noc01.stg and had it
> join and tested it out some. I don't know that we have a full testing
> plan, but it should work fine I would think.
>
> Not sure how to test meetbot logs, but they are just static html, so I
> would think they would work just fine too.
>
> kevin
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20110306/fc8016a1/attachment.html